ERP Applications and Vendors
  Home ERP Benefits Features Selection Implementation SAP Oracle Microsoft Dynamics Books
ERP Guide
Business Performance
Change Management
Data Migration
Decision Making
Enterprise 2.0 S/W
Enterprise System
ERP and Accounting S/W
Fix Implementation Failure
Functional Modules
Guide for Executives
Implementation Failure
Implementation Time
Improve ROI
Manufacturing S/W
Measuring Performance
Negotiating Agreements
Open Source S/W
Outsource Service Providers
Outsourcing Software
Project Management
Replace Existing Software
SAP Business One for SME
S/W for Telecom Sector
Syspro Accounting S/W
Vendor Shootout
Web Vs Server Based
When to Consider
 
Beginner's Guide
Basic Features
Become Consultant
Before Implementation
Best Practices
Certification Course
Effects of Enterprise S/W
ERP And CRM
ERP and SCM
Evolution and History
Finance Module
Functional Consultant
Functional vs Technical
Future of ERP
Future Trend
GAP Analysis
Get Maximum ROI
Goals and Objectives
Guide for Beginners
History and Evolution
Implementation Methods
Implementation So Long
Implementation Stages
Implementation Steps
Implementation Timeframe
Increase Productivity
Industry Focus
Issues In Outsourcing
Latest Trends
Major Pitfalls
Market and Industry
Market Growth In India
Methodologies
Open Source Popularity
Regulation Governing
Rising Need of S/W
Roles of Consultants
Software as a Service (SaaS)
Software for SMEs
System Requirements
 
 

What Are The Different Methods Of Implementing ERP?

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend


ERP implementation can be done through a number of methodologies. The traditional method required many phases such as pre planning stage, planning and analysis of requirements, implementation and post implementation testing and training. Some of the standard ways of implementation includes the Big Bang method, Parallel Adoption, Phased Rollout, Modular and Process oriented method.

Some of the common methods are

Traditional method: In the traditional method the vendor designs the software after studying the requirements of the client. The product is highly customized and client based. The process may take more than 2 years to complete and it is done in a number of stages. This method has a low risk of failure.

Big Bang: When the company plans to finish the process in one 'Go' it is called the Big Bang method. The buyer prepares its machines and sanctions the customized solution, and the whole system is modified once. This may be done in least time and it prevents wastages on various phases but it has one of the highest risks.

Phased Rollout: Phased rollout requires the industries to complete the process in various phases. In the initial stage the user machines are prepared for installation and in one phase the software is tested before implementation. As the customized product is sanctioned by the buyer, it is implemented in the many stages. This has lowest risk of failure and it enables the customer to test if the system is working properly at each stage.



Parallel Adoption: In parallel adoption method the client has a number of processes running in various stages and each process is integrated at one place. This may reduce time on implementation but if one process is dependent on other and the previous process has not completed it may further delay the complete process.

Unit-by-Unit: It is also called the unit-by-unit method, in which, the process starts with one business unit at one stage and later it is implemented in every departments .If a company has many branches which are located at various geographical regions the company may require a unit-by-unit method in which the system can be installed at every unit.

The method has better employee acceptance and it may take highest amount of time for the process. The risk rate for unit-by-unit method is less.

Modular: If the process is done module-wise, for example - the HR module is implemented first - then only the HR department has to spend time on the process, later the financial module is implemented - it is called modular method. It helps the company to ensure the modules are working as per the need of the departments but it may delay the whole process and complexities arise during integration of all the modules.

Process Oriented: In this technique the vendor aims to finish a critical process of the company first and then the related departments and branches are automated. The process starts with a small division and later it may grow to all the departments and business units. In this method the vendor may start with a key process initially to reduce inconvenience but even in this method the integration of various processes can be tough.





 Read Related Articles

ERP SoftwareERP for Decision Making
ERP SystemEffects of ERP System
Enterprise SystemTime Taken for ERP Implementation
Enterprise SoftwareERP Consultants Roles and Responsibilities

  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Review Section
Aplicor  
Dynamics AX  
Dynamics CRM  
Dynamics GP  
Dynamics NAV  
Dynamics SL  
Epicor  
Godrej eNcompass  
JD Edward  
Infor  
Microsoft Dynamics  
MySAP  
Netsuite  
Oracle  
Ramco  
SAGE MAS90  
Sage X3  
SAP  
SAP Business One  
Tally Accounting  
 
SAP Section
ABAP Module  
Architecture  
Business Warehouse  
BW Module  
Career In ABAP  
CO Module  
Components  
Course Duration  
Course Fees  
CRM  
Customization  
Data Warehousing  
Enterprise Portal  
FI Module  
Features  
HRMS Software  
HR Module  
Job Opportunities  
MM Module  
Modules Features  
Online Training  
Performance Tuning  
SD Module  
Web AS  
Web AS Features  
xApps